This isn’t just nostalgia talking. It’s about power. While we scroll through sanitized feeds and click through curated content, a handful of companies are quietly reshaping humanity’s digital destiny. The real question is: are we okay with letting them?
Joan Westenberg
The Internet is Shrinking (Westenberg)
The physical world equivalent for a fully decentralized fediverse then is that every user sends mail to every other user’s house, as needed, similar to how sending letters works in the physical world. This is decidedly not the case with a fully decentralized ATProto. The physical world equivalent would be that every user had their own house at which they stored a copy of every piece of mail delivered to every other user at their house.
If this sounds infeasible to do in our metaphorical domestic environment, that’s because it is. A world of full self-hosting is not possible with Bluesky. In fact, it is worse than the storage requirements, because the message delivery requirements become quadratic at the scale of full decentralization: to send a message to one user is to send a message to all. Rather than writing one letter, a copy of that letter must be made and delivered to every person on earth.
Christine Lemmer-Webber
How decentralized is Bluesky really? (Dusty Cloud)
Multiple speech and content moderation experts 404 Media spoke to drew some parallels between these recent changes and when Facebook contributed to a genocide in Myanmar in 2017, in which Facebook was used to spread anti-Rohingya hate and the country’s military ultimately led a campaign of murder, torture, and rape against the Muslim minority population. Although there are some key differences, Meta’s changes in the U.S. will also likely lead to the spread of more hate speech across Meta’s sites, with the real world consequences that can bring.
Joseph Cox
Meta Is Laying the Narrative Groundwork for Trump’s Mass Deportations (404 Media)
Twitter was my favorite social media site. It was a great way to stay up-to-date on just about anything. I could get news of all sorts there from big headline news to news for my relatively niche hobbies. I never really used it to interact with friends and family (that was what I used Facebook and Instagram for), but it had been my most used of social sites for years by a wide margin.
It wasn’t perfect though, There were lots of trolls on the site who would pounce on you when you said something they wanted to be controversial like “bigotry is bad”. It also offered some of the best tools to moderate your own timeline though. It was easy to block people. There were tools to block everyone who liked a particularly asinine tweet.
When Elon Musk bought the site with the clear intention of making it more friendly towards its trolls, I deleted my account.
I first made an Instagram account for testing when I was working on Windows Phone. It ended up being a great app. I could open it up and see photos from my friends. I even made a second account to have a public one to post miniature photos too, and a third for sharing my collection of LEGO minifigures.
During the summer of 2023, the fact that I would open up the app and only see photos and video clips from people I didn’t follow and had no interest in ever following rather than the photos I wanted to see from friends and family wore me out. I haven’t posted anything to my personal account since then.
Facebook has been a background social network for me. When I first started using it, I friended friends from school and family members and got a pretty good timeline to stay up-to-date on all those people. Over time, it too has morphed away from feeling like a place where I see things from my friends into one where Facebook shows me a random assortment of pages, communities I’m not part of, and ads. Pictures I posted to Instagram got cross-posted to Facebook for folks there to see, but like I said, I haven’t posted personal pictures in about a year and a half now. I have shared some news stories I’ve found interesting, but like other social networks, I’m pretty sure Facebook tries to minimize how many people see posts that are links to outside sites.
With Mark Zuckerberg and Meta going all-in on accommodating the far right, I think the end of my accounts on Facebook and Instagram is quickly approaching.
I’m not going to disappear though. I enjoy sharing things on the internet and seeing what others share. It’s just that the tools we’ve all been using for that are no longer doing a good job of it. Luckily, there are alternatives.
Mastodon, an open-source, federated alternative to Twitter, has done an okay job filling my Twitter-shaped hole. It doesn’t have anywhere near the user base that Twitter once did, but it has enough people in areas I care about that I’ve got a useful timeline to follow for politics, tech news, and tabletop gaming discussions. If you’re on Mastodon, you can find me at @scottboehmer@mastodon.online.
I’ve tried a shared album on Google Photos as a replacement for sharing photos with friends and family, but that hasn’t been working out as well. I haven’t been particularly good about advertising its existence, and not many of my family members seem interested in using the service. I’ve been meaning to look around more for a better alternative. For public sharing of things like pictures of my painted miniatures, I’m looking into Pixelfed, but I have yet to find something that looks like a good solution for more personal photos. If you have a photo sharing service that you like using, please let me know.
Then I have my own websites for sharing things. This site is where I’ll be sharing articles and videos that I find interesting – the sort of things I might have once retweeted or posted to my Facebook page. Then I’ve had my gaming blog for years now, and that won’t be going anywhere. Both sites have RSS feeds and e-mail subscriptions to make them easy to follow. I also pay for hosting plans that allow both sites to not have any ads.
For following other people, I’ve been prioritizing RSS and email subscriptions depending on what’s available. I’ve even set up an email account to use just for newsletter subscriptions so that I can keep them separate from my primary inbox. For following RSS feeds, I’ve been using Feedly for years, but I’m not particularly happy with their more recent embrace of AI. It’s another place where I have a todo list item to see if I can find a better alternative.
I’d love to have the web feel like it’s easy to follow and share with all the people I care about in one convenient place again, but with the anti-human incentives of targeted digital ads, I feel that experience is now a thing of the past.
This is all to say that I’m of two minds about the legitimacy TikTok ban. China has cultivated a national surveillance apparatus so powerful and so efficient that it now exports city-scale surveillance packages to more than 52 nations around the world. Data inside a Chinese company is effectively also inside that national surveillance apparatus. So handing a live nationwide psychological profile on 150 million Americans to a Chinese-owned company is asking for trouble. But we also have shown such callous indifference to the privacy of Americans that specifically wringing our hands about TikTok while giving free rein to the rest of surveillance capitalism rings hollow to me.
Jacob Ward
The TikTok Ban Has Happened Before (The Rip Current)
The people running the majority of internet services have used a combination of monopolies and a cartel-like commitment to growth-at-all-costs thinking to make war with the user, turning the customer into something between a lab rat and an unpaid intern, with the goal to juice as much value from the interaction as possible. To be clear, tech has always had an avaricious streak, and it would be naive to suggest otherwise, but this moment feels different. I’m stunned by the extremes tech companies are going to extract value from customers, but also by the insidious way they’ve gradually degraded their products.
Edward Zitron
Never Forgive Them (Where’s Your Ed At?)
Keeping comments up on our site was a guarantee of misinformation, because with an annual editorial budget as small as ours, one shrinking each quarter, we couldn’t afford the personnel required to patrol even one day’s articles for misleading comments, much less those attached to articles going back years that kept finding traction in Google search results. Social media companies, which were clearly replacing the role of magazines like mine, were the only ones with the money necessary to fight what I considered a holy fight against deception. And until recently, the heads of those companies did make some attempt to moderate dangerous misinformation.
Jacob Ward
Why I Shut Off Comments for Millions of People (The Rip Current)
When Zuckerberg visited Mar-a-Lago on the evening before Thanksgiving, he and other guests reportedly stood with hands over hearts while listening to a recording of the national anthem sung by people accused of January 6–related crimes. Whether Zuckerberg knew who the singers were is unclear. But the scene was uncanny given that January 6, when it happened, was a bright-red line for the tech industry. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Twitch banned or suspended Trump, and companies such as Amazon paused donations to election deniers. Now, with the arrival of Trump 2.0, that red line has been erased entirely.
Lora Kelley
Silicon Valley Heads to Mar-a-Lago (The Atlantic)
When you post on social media, you are subject to the whims of whoever runs it. If you get banned, no one knows how to find you. If the website gets sold to someone who sucks, you cannot transfer your identity somewhere else. If the main algorithm that people use to find your posts starts suppressing your posts, you have no backup plan.
Social media leaves you bouncing from one enshittified, corporate-owned app to another.
…
When your favorite social media website gets bought by some asshole with more money than sense, you are going to be left holding the bag. If you have a website, you can link your social media profiles on the website, and build up a reputation as having that website so people know where to find you if your current social media implodes.
Nora Reed
You should have a website (Nora Zone)
Modern existence has become engulfed in sludge, the institutions that exist to cut through it bouncing between the ignorance of their masters and a misplaced duty in objectivity, our mechanisms for exploring and enjoying the world interfered with by powerful forces that are too-often left unchecked. Opening our devices is willfully subjecting us to attack after attack from applications, websites and devices that are built to make us do things rather than operate with the dignity and freedom that much of the internet was founded upon.
Ed Zitron
Lost In The Future (Where’s Your Ed At)
Scott Boehmer